I've started tutoring in earnest now. I have four students at current; it's note-worthy (though not really surprising) that all are at different places, and have different goals. One student wants help mostly learning computer literacy skills. Another, speaking and diction, and a third, help with skills to get a better job (he wants to be a security guard, with set hours, so he can spend more time with his family). Because I’m only here for a fairly short time I likely won’t see a complete accomplishment of these for any student, and that’s putting aside the fact that many of these goals are hard to measure in concrete terms. But, I hope to give the students I have the opportunity to work with a jump on the waiting list (which is pretty long at about fifty), and tools to continue pursuing knowledge on their own.
Additionally, I’ve begun working at my other site, CalSERVES. I’ve been doing lots of data-entry and record wrangling with tutors, the goal is to make a comprehensive volunteer information database. A cool skill I’ve learned is how to check most publicly available sex offender and felon database. I admit, it’s a specific talent, but a kind of cool one all the same. Interesting note, the building CalSERVES has office space in is an old Motorola office building. The offices themselves are quite normal, but the hallways are just weird, and mostly deserted as CalSERVES is the only leaser at current. The odd part is that it looks eerily like a stage from Perfect Dark, in it’s barren, half-used, industrial art sort of way. I’ll do a photo-comparison soon.
Another cool occurrence is that I was able to volunteer at the 40th Annual San Francisco Pride celebration this weekend past. I worked to help park performers and speakers at mainstage in front of City Hall, and had a decent time. I met some very cool people, got yelled at by individuals without tags who I wouldn’t let see the Backstreet Boys (they played a three song set, and limo-ed away as fast as they could). But looking back on it, it was cool that I was able to contribute in a concrete way to happening of such an awesome (and what I consider essential) event.
I warn now that some filigreed, word-mincing bits of attempted pedagogical insight follow. I hope it’s at least somewhat readable. I tried typing out my views on education, but it came out a bit long, so I think I’ll separate it into a few parts. This first portion is on engaging a student’s critical thinking skills.
Because of the breadth of subjects the different students have interests in, different sorts of skills and focuses are the order of the day. But I do use somewhat similar methods with all, pedagogically speaking. I like to use Socratic techniques, of encouraging students to call upon their basis of knowledge by asking questions. Every person has a body of knowledge that they can call upon, and whether it’s based upon prior schooling, life experiences, or, that most noble of goals, self-education, it often contains some part of solving a problem at hand. If that is not the case, one can revise or amend that previously held knowledge by way of reflecting on why it was they were wrong.
Thus, a core pillar of my pedagogical philosophy is to ask learners to call upon their own, previously established knowledge. This is important with students of any age, but particularly adults, I think. A chance to use a student’s prior knowledge in solving a problem, and then reflecting on how that prior knowledge held up to the given circumstances, whether right or wrong, is part of learning actively. Being able to integrate learned knowledge into world-view promotes retention of this new-found knowledge. Another important element of this style of learning is that one can do it by oneself. Most of us practice it everyday, even if we don’t reflect on it actively.
The way I see it, it’s my job as a tutor to challenge the student to think critically, and learn on their own terms. To this end, I ask lots of questions, I question the students answers, and hopefully have them think about “how” and “why,” once we deal the “what” at hand. It doesn’t help very much that the English language tends to be mostly exceptions, and not so many rules. Of course, there are times when rote instruction is called for, particularly with my student who wants a better job: he is still working on connecting phonemes and graphemes, and the only way to really learn that is memorization and application.
I suppose I’ll continue this thread, of how I view instruction in the next post.
The quail know that you didn't mention them in your blog post. And they are not happy about it.
ReplyDeleteREEH-EHH-EHHH.
Have you heard about the new inquiry based trend in education, especially science? It's a lot like what it sounds like you're already doing. My museum has a couple of educators trained in the technique, but since I'm only there for the summer I probably won't be. It's super fantastic though.
ReplyDeleteTo Daphne,
ReplyDeleteI don't think I have, but I've certainly discussed the idea with a few friends of mine. I think a problem lies specifically with lab science classes, in that you're graded in how "correct" your answers are, but correctness is defined as being able to replicate a task perfectly.
While, in principle, if the task at hand can be replicated, and always produces the same (or similar) results, it's a great way to learn methods and processes. But, from what I've heard that not always the case. And further, the goal for lots of students won't be to master the process, but to get the carrot and not the stick, so they care more about getting the "right" numbers than learning.
Of course, I've gotten into a sort of tangled region of thought; the same could be said of much, if not most, schoolwork. What museum are you working with?